ATO, FedRAMP 20x,
800-53, 800-171, CMMC.

Everything below is a projection of three records: proof of state (what your cloud was, as of any timestamp), proof of change (what changed it, append only and hash chained), and proof of agency (what your machines were allowed to do, and what they actually did).

The SSP, POA&M, and SAR are generated from that one implementation record, not written beside it. OSCAL 1.1.2 export, SPRS-relevant evidence for the 110 requirements of NIST 800-171, and continuous authorization records are the same rows in a different envelope. When a collector was down or a scope was unobserved, the projection says so: a declared gap with interval and reason, never silently fewer rows.

An authorization decision is a claim about a system as of a date. The record regenerates to any historical timestamp, so the package your authorizing official signed and the package you hold today differ only by rows you can enumerate. Chain verification tells both of you whether anything was edited after the fact.

Monitoring against NIST 800-53, NIST 800-171, and CIS benchmarks, written as evidence: every observation content hashed with SHA3-256, timestamped, appended to the chain, retained seven years. A control that stopped being observed produces a declared gap, not a stale green.

CMMC Level 2 assesses the 110 requirements of NIST 800-171. Start with the public ten-question readiness assessment, which runs in your browser without an account or cloud connection. Work the 110-control checklist requirement by requirement, then review how an evidence package is prepared for the assessor. Product access requires a separate request and review.

Two questions a program office asks early: what will this cost, and how much calendar remains. The calculators exist so both answers arrive before the first conversation.

One brief per framework or mission context: what the record contributes to that obligation, and what remains yours to do.

If you want the record stood up for you, the delivery engagement is 30 days at a fixed fee, run on the same software indexed on this page. The procurement facts your contracting office asks for are published, not emailed on request.

The pages above describe outputs. The software that produces them runs inside your tenant with no telemetry pipeline back to PolicyCortex, and every autonomous action is bounded by an envelope: blast radius, cost ceiling, change windows, an andon cord. The delivery team uses the same software; there is no internal edition.