sha3:51055ba0292d6d0b3786dc3206b15c6e34e10566ffb4e4d0749cd163880f43bbIntactRegister / Compare / Vanta
PolicyCortex vs Vanta
Vanta and PolicyCortex both automate compliance evidence, for different questions. Vanta collects evidence periodically and shows compliance state inside its multi-tenant SaaS product. PolicyCortex records what your cloud was, what changed it, and what machines were allowed to do, hash chained in your own tenant, so an assessor recomputes the evidence rather than viewing it.
01 Where the evidence lives 02 Verifiable by a second party 03 Tamper evidence 04 Gaps declared 05 Remediation model 06 AI agent coverage 07 Federal packaging 08 Evaluation # one row per question, both answers on the record
b1e2b168962026f6d0cf70a7be16e24fe3b06a05d8da443d4f928ca6223d9ffbprev:13931b0ae8f1Where the evidence lives, and who can check it.
Both products, asked the same eight questions. PolicyCortex cells restate the register; Vanta cells restate what Vanta states about itself in public documentation, and say so where it does not.
| Question | PolicyCortex | Vanta |
|---|---|---|
| Where the evidence lives | The customer's tenant. Collectors, policy engine, evidence store, decision layer and export surface all run there. No telemetry pipeline to PolicyCortex servers and no egress of evidence. | Vendor cloud. Vanta runs as a multi-tenant SaaS platform; GovCloud and on-premises deployment are not offered. |
| Verifiable by a second party | By recomputation. Export the stream, recompute SHA3-256 over each record plus the digest of the record before it, compare: INTACT, or the first sequence number where integrity fails. No PolicyCortex account or API in the loop. | Presented in the product. Vanta collects evidence periodically and presents compliance state at points in time. Recomputation by a second party is not stated. |
| Tamper evidence | Hash chained and append-only. There is no update or delete verb in the store; an edit breaks the edited record and every digest after it. | Not stated by vendor |
| Gaps declared | Declared. When a collector is down or a scope is unobserved, the chain carries a gap record: stream, interval, reason, declared_at. | Not stated by vendor |
| Remediation model | Approval-gated proposals. The reasoning layer proposes and cannot execute. SHADOW executes nothing; GATED, the default, puts a named human on each action; AUTONOMOUS is limited to narrow, well-tested action classes with all three policy gates still run. | None. Vanta reads configuration data from cloud APIs to verify control states; when it identifies a gap it creates a finding and routes it to your team. |
| AI agent coverage | Proof of agency: the envelope that permitted each autonomous action, the chained record of what it did, and the counterfactual that would have blocked it. Models and agents in scope are inventoried and mapped against 64 MITRE ATLAS techniques, with unbounded techniques recorded as declared gaps. | Not stated by vendor |
| Federal packaging | OSCAL 1.1.2 export with SSP, SAR, POA&M, eMASS XML and evidence indexes generated from one implementation record. AWS and Azure boundaries for ATO packaging. | CMMC has been added to a framework list built for commercial compliance. SSP, POA&M or authorization package generation is not stated. |
| Evaluation | Request Access. Our team reviews your requirements and agrees on scope and commercial terms before onboarding in your tenant. | Not stated by vendor |
PolicyCortex cells restate the register pages. Competitor cells restate the vendor's public product documentation as read in March 2026; where it does not state a fact, the cell says so. Corrections to [email protected]. The register facts are stated on the architecture, the three proof records, and the federal record.
f8e5db7093be8aae1e326cfb7b0b680a53b08237576c4fe53f305da6636f010eprev:b1e2b1689620What is on record about Vanta
Vanta automates compliance for commercial frameworks: evidence collection, control mapping, vendor questionnaires, and auditor collaboration for SaaS, healthcare and fintech companies. It runs as a multi-tenant SaaS platform, reads configuration data from cloud APIs to verify control states, collects evidence periodically, and presents compliance state at points in time. CMMC has been added to its framework list. It has relationships with major auditing firms and strong vendor risk management. It does not offer GovCloud or on-premises deployment.
26dbe7a3ba8de1bcd787f90167fc9e85b89d7823bacea9613670662e12b629d2prev:f8e5db7093beWhere the two differ
The difference is not framework count. It is what happens to a fact after it is observed.
Vanta observes a control state and shows it to you, and to your auditor, inside its own product. When it finds a gap it creates a task for your team; its cloud access is read only.
PolicyCortex observes the same state and writes it as a record in your tenant: the raw provider response, content hashed with SHA3-256, chained to the record before it, with the control mapping stored on the record. An assessor verifies it by recomputing the chain, with no PolicyCortex account in the loop. When a collector is down, the chain says so. When a fix is proposed, the proposal, the gate results, the approving identity, the before and after state hashes and a rollback identifier land on the same chain as the evidence.
Vanta answers what your posture is today, in the vendor's view. The register answers what was true on the date the assessor names, and how they would know.
1912dd2dc02c9b00021d2b7ce3f811ee3f26bd940926cb25fa432c738e1fa73eprev:26dbe7a3ba8dWhen to choose which
Choose Vanta if you are a commercial company pursuing commercial certifications and you want vendor risk management and auditor collaboration workflows in one product.
Choose PolicyCortex if you are accountable for a cloud or AI system in a regulated environment, you need evidence an assessor can recompute rather than view, and you need it kept in your own tenant, including GovCloud and GCC High. An organization can run Vanta for commercial obligations and PolicyCortex for the federal record; the two address different needs.
bf45bc3ab849f06343fe2a0c457d66a7b579e2db97c36ab62ecd75360f11d8e7prev:1912dd2dc02cQuestions buyers ask about the two.
- Q-01
Can Vanta handle CMMC compliance?
Vanta has added CMMC to a framework list built for commercial compliance, and its cloud access is read only. What it does not state is where the evidence lives beyond its own cloud, whether an assessor can recompute it, or what it records when a collector is down. Those are the questions the table above asks of both products.
- Q-02
How is approval-gated remediation different from a finding?
Vanta identifies a gap and creates a task for your team. PolicyCortex records a proposal that cannot execute on its own, the three gate results, the approving identity in GATED mode, the before and after state hashes and a rollback identifier, on the same chain as the evidence, so the fix and its authority are one record.
- Q-03
Can PolicyCortex run in GovCloud or GCC High?
Yes. It runs inside the customer tenant, including AWS GovCloud, Azure Government and GCC High, and on-premises delivery for air-gapped environments is available. Vanta runs as a multi-tenant SaaS platform and does not offer GovCloud or on-premises deployment.
- Q-04
Can we run both?
Yes. An organization can run Vanta for commercial obligations and PolicyCortex for the federal record. The two address different needs, and nothing in the register depends on replacing a GRC tool.
51055ba0292d6d0b3786dc3206b15c6e34e10566ffb4e4d0749cd163880f43bbprev:bf45bc3ab849What this comparison is not.
Ask us the same eight questions, in your own tenant.
Request Access